SeattleScience.com


Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Revised WA Math Standards Draft Available for Public Comment

Filed under: Math, Standards — Justin @ 12:50 pm

Since many Seattle science teachers also teach math, the following may be of interest.

From Terry Bergeson, Superintendent of Public Instruction:

Dear Friends of K-12 Mathematics Education:

As you may be aware, the Charles A. Dana Center for Mathematics and Science Education affiliated with the University of Texas at Austin has been selected to assist the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) to lead the K-12 mathematics standards revision process in response to the State Board of Education’s independent review of the K-12 mathematics standards. The result will be a set of K-12 mathematics standards defined by revised Essential Academic Learning Requirements (EALRs) and accompanying Grade-Level Expectations (GLEs) that embody the mathematics required for success in the 21st-century society and economy.

In particular, the revised standards will build on the acknowledged strengths of Washington’s current EALRs and GLEs as identified in the State Board of Education’s Review and Recommendation Report while setting higher expectations for Washington students by:

  • Restoring the balance of process and content at the elementary
    levels
  • Fortifying mathematics content and increasing its rigor
  • Identifying areas of emphasis at each grade level (for example providing more guidance about the specific performance levels of computational fluency and use of algorithms)
  • Increasing the clarity and usability of the standards for both educators and the public

OSPI is required to present the revised standards to the State Legislature by January 31, 2008. Committees have been established in accordance with the project plan and timeline within the Dana Center contract. The committees will include a Project Management Team, a Standards Revision Team (SRT), an Articulation Team, and Editorial Teams. The chart below describes the role of each committee, the timeline for work, and the participants. Participation on the SRT was determined as a result of a competitive application process in late September. Applications were distributed to a variety of stakeholder groups across Washington including mathematicians, mathematics educators, teachers, curriculum experts, and business/community leaders.

Applications were reviewed and scored based on a rubric that evaluated the applicants’ relevant mathematics experience and knowledge; awards and recognition; and their response to the narrative question: “Identify how standards can improve mathematics education.” 157 applications were received to fill available positions.

The revision process will offer many opportunities for public comment.

The project web site will be created and maintained by the Dana Center; we expect this site to be available in early November as a link from the OSPI homepage. (edit: The site is available now at this address –JB). The web site will contain materials from SRT meetings, the most current version of the revised standards, and a system for providing email comment. Beginning in late November, focus groups will be held with key stakeholder groups both separately and in conjunction with existing meetings and conferences.

Please refer to the attached chart for more detail regarding the different committees that will contribute to and lead the standards revision process in the coming months. Please note that we will have additional background information on the committee members posted to the project web site in the coming weeks. Our timeline is daunting, but the tremendously talented and diverse mathematics revision team are up to the task.

The coming months are sure to bring exciting opportunities as we revise our K-12 mathematics standards. I sincerely appreciate your support and interest in this process and I look forward to keeping you updated and involved as we proceed.

Sincerely,

Terry Bergeson

You can view the draft standards here

Thursday, September 1, 2005

Middle School Science GLEs, by Grade

Filed under: WASL, Standards — Justin @ 4:18 pm

OSPI has published a beautiful book of the science Grade Level Expectations, but they’re more suited for looking nice in a k-10 page spread than they are useful for planning. I’ve copied them into Word, and cut them down to the middle school GLEs. It’s very easy to copy from these files into your syllabus or other documents. Also, it’s only 8 pages to print all of the middle school science GLEs, instead of 84 pages for the k-10 publication.

Here are the current GLEs (Grade Level Expectations), by grade level and all together, in Word Format:

6th grade

7th grade

8th grade

6th-8th grades

Sunday, November 21, 2004

Science Grade Level Expectations (GLEs)

Filed under: Teacher Tips, Resources, Teaching and Learning, Standards — Justin @ 11:20 pm

The new Science GLEs (Grade Level Expectations) are available in Word and PDF format from OSPI. (warning: very large 94-page file)

GLEs are detailed expectations of what will be taught at each grade level. This is possibly the most pedagogically useful document ever published by OSPI. Departments and teachers should set aside time to go through the dozens of pages of clear, well-written expectations.

Each expectation contains a task that corresponds to one of the levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Each page shows the strand, EALR, component, grade level, and specific examples. There is also a chart on p. 10 that shows the suggested sequence of topics at each grade level. I was surprised to see how much astronomy should be emphasized in the 6th grade, as the MSSSCP-adopted kits do not address astronomy until Earth in Space in 8th grade.

Do note, though, that the EALRs have not changed. The only major change is that the “systems / inquiry / design” symbol has been changed to “systems / inquiry / application.”

Tuesday, September 14, 2004

Washington Science GLEs

Filed under: Resources, WASL, Standards — Justin @ 4:35 pm

Washington state Grade Level Expectations are available in draft form from OSPI here: Science GLEs (draft). (note: 91-page, 1.9 MB PDF file - not recommended for dialup)

Sunday, July 18, 2004

Categories

Placeholder